+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    St. Cloud, MN
    Posts
    3,015
    Car
    337, '98 Jetta GLX

    Default New IIHS Crash Test - Most Cars Perform Poorly

    Hopefully the added structures needed to pass this test won't add too much weight in future generations of cars.

    http://blog.caranddriver.com/iihs-ad...erform-poorly/
    Quote Originally Posted by 9jetta6 View Post
    Oh dang it does look like its chopped in the back there. Clicked on the link, if its actually legit and can run good, looks fun.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St Pauly Shore
    Posts
    18,400
    Car
    06 Audi A3

    Default

    Yeah saw this. I guess Mercedes is all up in arms over it. I saw a video of a vw cc and it got pretty smashed. I havent seen the bmw video until now.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,184
    Car
    Fastest VW in MN.

    Default

    The oil companies live this shit.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Como.
    Posts
    12,374
    Car
    911, JKU, 330i.

    Default

    ^ you took 1.5 hours longer than I thought you would to post that.

    Must have been too busy F5ing infowars, or whatever wack-ass site you get your "news" from.
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Stig View Post
    My man a bum he say he aint the daddy n e ways.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,184
    Car
    Fastest VW in MN.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by palmer View Post
    ^ you took 1.5 hours longer than I thought you would to post that.

    Must have been too busy F5ing infowars, or whatever wack-ass site you get your "news" from.
    Shouldnt you be our crying somewhere? Or is your self medicating actually working now?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    329
    Car
    .

    Default

    People freak out that cars are designed and tested to performance standards under a very particular set of circumstances. I'm never really sure exactly why. I understand that it's rational for people to be mostly ignorant about everything around them. But this base level instinct to flip out at the slightest suggestion of that ignorance is something I can't understand. It certainly doesn't help anything at all. People fundamentally misunderstand engineering.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Como.
    Posts
    12,374
    Car
    911, JKU, 330i.

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KOOTER View Post
    Or is your self medicating actually working now?

    I'm not the one who needs medication.
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Stig View Post
    My man a bum he say he aint the daddy n e ways.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Shakopee, MN
    Posts
    8,053
    Car
    2007 Wolfsburg Jetta

    Default

    This new test is bullshit. There is always going to be some shape you can hit that a car can't stand up to very well.

    What the government needs to do instead of coming up with crazy new crash tests that will raise the cost of cars is REQUIRE drivers to take safe driving courses and pay fucking attention to what they are doing on the road.

    No cell phone laws need to be made and inforced. The no texting law needs to be in forced. Do this shit first instead of coming up with more crash tests.

    This new test fucking pisses me off, can you tell. I also like that Mercedes has stated they will not bother trying to pass this new test, they claim thier cars are safe enough already.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Blaine
    Posts
    5,004
    Car
    855 Turbo x2

    Default

    meanwhile the Volvo engineers are cheering.
    Nobody sits like this rock sits. You rock, rock. The rock just sits and is. You show us how to just sit here and that's what we need.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    9,968
    Car
    50mpg double wishbone

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toasted View Post
    This new test is bullshit. There is always going to be some shape you can hit that a car can't stand up to very well.

    What the government needs to do instead of coming up with crazy new crash tests that will raise the cost of cars is REQUIRE drivers to take safe driving courses and pay fucking attention to what they are doing on the road.

    No cell phone laws need to be made and inforced. The no texting law needs to be in forced. Do this shit first instead of coming up with more crash tests.

    This new test fucking pisses me off, can you tell. I also like that Mercedes has stated they will not bother trying to pass this new test, they claim thier cars are safe enough already.
    I fully agree, but prescribing a quick fix instead of addressing the root issue is America's strong suit. Why face the problems? Just pass our inadequacy on to every consumer in the form of higher prices and lower fuel economy. But higher "safety"! Think of it as a consumer tax for sucking at driving.
    Quote Originally Posted by sprstu View Post
    and mesmerizing. Ive never considered how much those balls move about until now.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    329
    Car
    .

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
    Think of it as a consumer tax for sucking at driving.
    Yes.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    10,824
    Car
    MK1 Caddy

    Default

    What are the odds someone is going to hit a non-deformable barrier at 40 mph on the 25% of the driver's side anyways? The only thing I can think of on the road that is like that, might be the large cement dividers, but most of those have those drums with water in them to defect or drastically slow the vehicle before hitting. Seems like a bullshit test to me.
    Quote Originally Posted by palmer View Post
    Teach a man to fish, and he will shut trannys up all day.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    St. Cloud, MN
    Posts
    3,015
    Car
    337, '98 Jetta GLX

    Default

    ^from the article:
    A 2009 IIHS study revealed that among cars with good ratings for frontal crash protection, small overlap collisions make up almost 25 percent of crashes resulting in serious or fatal injuries to front-seat occupants.
    Quote Originally Posted by 9jetta6 View Post
    Oh dang it does look like its chopped in the back there. Clicked on the link, if its actually legit and can run good, looks fun.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    10,824
    Car
    MK1 Caddy

    Default

    ^ but why a non-deformable object? Most the objects most cars will hit are all going to be deformable.
    Quote Originally Posted by palmer View Post
    Teach a man to fish, and he will shut trannys up all day.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,184
    Car
    Fastest VW in MN.

    Default

    Terror! terror! terror! We are all going to crash and die if we do not drive tanks! Every time they change the rules their buddies get richer and we get poorer.

Similar Threads

  1. 1959 vs 2009 Chevy crash test....
    By shawn o in forum Euro Automotive Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-13-2011, 09:59 AM
  2. New Saab 9-5 - Crash test
    By audivwdave in forum Euro Automotive Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-01-2010, 07:26 PM
  3. People that road test cars
    By audivwdave in forum Euro Automotive Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-30-2008, 05:27 PM
  4. Chinese truck crash test video
    By vweezly in forum Euro Automotive Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-30-2008, 11:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts